hi, anonym: > anonym: >> intrigeri: >>> * it integrates nicely in a GNOME desktop (e.g. in terms of HIG ⇒ >>> consistent UI & UX).
> I did a quick and dirty test: [...] > which starts a-c-w (but actually configuring Tor fails, which I expected). > GNOME integration is currently not great: > * the fonts are very small (and perhaps blurrier?). FTR, I observe the same > in Electrum. > * Qt GUI elements (e.g. buttons) are fairly different than the GTK ones. > My hope is that we could improve this with something like > qt5-gtk-platformtheme, or perhaps themes like QGnomePlatform and > adwaita-qt. Thanks for trying and reporting back! FWIW toolkit and visual rendering matters are important, but only a subset of what I meant with desktop integration / HIG / consistent UI & UX. I'm confident we can easily fix the widgets & fonts via purely technical means, but the HIG part is about GUI *design*: https://developer.gnome.org/hig/stable/ Now, of course I agree that we should not hold a-c-w to a higher standard than the future Tor Launcher in this respect. My point here is to highlight this important criterion while it's still time to adjust the design, rather than at a latter time when developers might be more defensive since they consider the new thing as finished ;) Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
