Hi! On 30.11.19 18:42, intrigeri wrote: > please provide early feedback about the first proof-of-concept import > of our public Redmine data into GitLab: > > https://0xacab.org/intrigeri/redmine-import-1/issues
I like it! > This is not a hard deadline: I'm happy to gather feedback continuously > along the course of this project. But the earlier you take a look, > the greater the chances that we can incorporate your feedback. > > There will be other calls for feedback as we make progress. :)))) (I'm deleting everyting I agree with.) > - Links to Redmine point to our current Redmine, while after the final > migration, they will instead point to the upcoming static archive > of Redmine. I like the archive idea. > - We did not design a replacement workflow for Core team > self-management (ala #16209) yet. I think in the past this was also designed and used by few teams consistently, so maybe when we move to Gitlab this could become a problem to solve collectively, in another discussion. > Known problems that we *might* be able to solve later > ===================================================== > > - All issues appear to have been created by the user account that did > the migration. We could fix that if we're migrating to a GitLab > instance on which we have admin credentials so we can impersonate > other users. Else, this problem will remain and the best we will > have is the free-form annotation in the issue description, e.g. > "Original created by @intrigeri on 17117 (Redmine)". To me this is not a problem, as the information is there. However, it would probably be easier for the eye and the brain if the user accounts would correspond. > See https://salsa.debian.org/tails-team/gitlab-migration/issues. I did not look at this. - u. _______________________________________________ Tails-project mailing list Tails-project@boum.org https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-project
