hi, Random User: > 1.) Is the ISO file currently at > http://dl.amnesia.boum.org/tails/stable/tails-i386-2.7/tails-i386-2.7.iso > the same as the one that was there at the start of November 15th (UTC)?
This is not something you should rely upon in general. > The .sig file that I downloaded at that time from the above directory > would appear to be the same as the one that is currently found at > wget https://tails.boum.org/torrents/files/tails-i386-2.7.iso.sig > (The hashes I get are the same) If the signature verifies the ISO you have correctly, then it should be good :) > This leaves the question I had asked about the RSA key used to sign this > latest release of Tails, "0xAF292B44A0EDAA41": > Has it been used before? https://tails.boum.org/doc/about/openpgp_keys/ > 2.) >> Looks like the way they're checking [ i.e., distrowatch.com] for the latest >> *released* Tails >> version is buggy. Do you want to talk to them about it? > I suppose I could email Distrowatch about the matter but what exactly > would I say? Just that they're displaying erroneous info about Tails? Cheers, -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ tails-support mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-support To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
