On 26.12.2013 17:09, Frederik Ramm wrote:
* source tag on every building (source tag on changeset would be enough)
Indeed. If a building has source=basemap.at (or bing etc.) and then someone adds other tags, the source tag is incorrect for these other tags.
If source tags are needed on a feature for some reason, better use source:geometry or similar.
* very small buildings seem to be badly traced (triangular shapes etc) - - perhaps just drop everything below 10 square metres or so. There seem to be a number of mismatches between the data and Bing imagery - but I guess that's because basemap.at is newer? Examples: http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/kittsee.png
No, basemap.at is older. It's probably the collection of the oldest data we have ever seen. It seems that the street names originated from the same data source as of plan.at. A good test for this is Severusgasse in Hainburg. There is a road that never ever existed in the real world. All of these data collections inherited that bogus road.
Shape and placement of buildings is also quite poor on basemap.at. It is obvious that an import for only one village requires more overall work than just drawing the buildings manually using geoimage.at.
But, of course, this can be considered as a test run, with the intention to import buildings for other villages too, or even for all buildings in Austria... This would get us quickly a lot of data, with quantity compensating for quality, like plan.at import.
-- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria _______________________________________________ Talk-at mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
