John Smith <delta_foxt...@...> writes: > --- On Tue, 18/8/09, Elizabeth Dodd <ed...@...> wrote: > > the logic of the references isn't well expressed > The problem stems from sticking 2 values into a single one and now we're > all confused about it :) > > Since the A1 is the A1, but the NH1 is just 1 I think. > > > perhaps its network=NH > > ref =A20 > > In this case, I think that seems to be correct, I wonder how this applies > to the Bruce Highway for example, it seems to be just the A1 and no > NH shield any more... > > network=A > ref=A1 > > ?
Hi John, Maybe I'm a little confused, but given this discussion & looking at a recent change to the Australian Tagging Guidelines on the wiki, has the network/ref tagging changed from your original proposal? I thought the network tag was for removing the letter prefix from the number, but are we now doing network=A, ref=A1? Isn't this just the same as before but with an extra tag? I think this is why I am concerned about adding the addr: tags to the ref relations, is it not redundant data given that we have suburb boundaries, we know with reasonable certainty that a node is in what suburb/state/country? I see changes to the cycle route tagging guide says to potentially add all suburb/state/country tags. It's like adding is_in tags to all nodes/ways even though we have suburb boundaries (thanks again Franc!!). Is it some limitation of the mapnik styles that caused the US guys to create the similar tagging scheme? Ideally it could be solved with code instead of adding to the burden of tagging. Also looking at the the text for the Route section of the Au tag guide page, I think it is too verbose & mixes guidelines with reasoning & thoughts. Given it's a wiki, I might work on wording and make some changes (kind of similar to the OpenSource mantra of stop whinging, show me some code). The gist of it is leave: * mention old & new shield system * tagging example * Highway Refs (but name it something like "Network Refs" or "Sign Shield Refs") Move "Minor Roads" sentence to the Naming Streets sections (since that is what it is). Remove the distinction between Major & Minor Highways tagging, to something simple like: If a named route & a numbered route follow the same ways, combine into a single relation. If they finish at different spots or take different paths, create a separate relation for the named & numbered route. Example of a combined: name= Thingamajig Highway network=C ref=123 route=road type=route Thoughts / better ideas? BlueMM _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
