I had made the assumption based on a small(ish) sample of postcodes in major cities that for the ABS data set, that the boundaries between adjacent postcodes were coincident with boundaries between suburns (sorry for the mouthful).
I noted several suburbs that consisted of disjoint areas, so I would assume that postcodes could be the same (I'd even expect this to be more common). Have you found cases where the postcode boundaries don't lie on top of the suburb boundaries ? (which would make the problem even uglier) cheers On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Liz <[email protected]> wrote: > is it thought that we can draw boundaries around unique post code areas? > we could be wrong > 2652 (i've been cheating off the database) > extends merriwagga > goolgowi > tabbita > boorga > and then reappears in another area > grong grong > matong > (skips a few towns) > marrar > mangoplah > old junee > then south of the Sturt > tarcutta > uranquinty > boree creek > and just east of wagga > gumly gumly > and apparently near tumbarumba > rosewood > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > -- Franc
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
