2009/10/26 swanilli <[email protected]>: > I agree with Graeme Wilson. > > OSM should not include non-existent roads. The only convincing argument I > have seen put so far by the minority who want to show them is that it will > save other mappers from wasted time. Given that mappers are the minority and > people like Graeme in the majority I think it is there needs that should be > given priority.
The only reason given so far that this shouldn't happen is so it doesn't render, but there is a lot of data that exists that isn't intended for rendering. > Further, there is still the unresolved problem of what to tag these roads. > "Non-existent" is unhelpful and ambiguous as many people have pointed out > here. As far as I am concerned "non-existent roads" are in the same category > as childrens' "imaginary friends", important to the individual but not of > much interest to anyone else. So far you are the only one suggesting non-existent is unhelpful or ambiguous, please explain how it is either of these things. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
