On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Roy Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > For example, take a close look at the proposed definition of > "member_club" - is it in the form of "if A and B and C, it's a > member_club"? If so, isn't it a better solution to *tag* A and B and > C? There's no need to create complex definitions. So why do it?
Because otherwise, the logic "if A and B and C then member_club" needs to be encoded in each and every renderer. Now, I don't mind if you want to tag the thing "A, B, C, member_club". But tagging it "A, B, C" and expecting all renderers to give you the right result will not work. Even less so when you expect a certain icon or something to be displayed. Can you think of any examples where it does? (Oh wait, Roy believes that we shouldn't ever think about renderers, they're totally irrelevant. Just tag what you want to tag.) Steve _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
