2009/12/21 Roy Wallace <[email protected]>: > 1) Obviously, use what's already documented/in use where possible - > e.g. atm=yes is established, so use it instead of amenity:atm=yes
See below... > 2) If it can only reasonably be interpreted as an amenity, I don't > think you need to use an "amenity:" prefix - it's redundant, right? Is > there any consensus on how to tag when you want to tag X=Y + X=Z? Is > using X:Y=yes + X:Z=yes best-practice, or just Y=yes + Z=yes? Maybe > this is worth starting a new thread on... > 3) Regardless though, as I said, make sure "it's documented and the > tags are explicit in their meaning" - then you can't go wrong I assumed, perhaps incorrectly in hindsight, that to combine them would make more sense, rather than stripping off the part of it *shrug* > Sorry I don't have time right now to do a bunch of wiki searching to > give you more specific answers. Maybe let me know if there's any > particular tags you're not sure about? > Well the data is already in the DB, so once we figure out what to change them to we can just bulk update them. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
