On 7 April 2011 06:58, Ian Sergeant <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7 April 2011 12:57, David Murn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If the Australian issue is so important, as others have suggested why >> isnt OSMF seeking to make a rapid agreement with NearMap as was done >> with Bing? > > This really needs to be done. > > Is wonder if this is just due to a shortage of time that the LWG > hasn't included this as yet? >
Absolutely and it is a important to LWG too. We have had discussions with NearMap in the past. Last discussion with NearMap was passing the revised Contributor Terms 1.2.4 to NearMap for their legal review, we are currently waiting on them. Regards Grant LWG Member. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
