On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:19:39 +0100 Grant Slater <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7 April 2011 06:58, Ian Sergeant <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7 April 2011 12:57, David Murn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> If the Australian issue is so important, as others have suggested > >> why isnt OSMF seeking to make a rapid agreement with NearMap as > >> was done with Bing? > > > > This really needs to be done. > > > > Is wonder if this is just due to a shortage of time that the LWG > > hasn't included this as yet? > > > > Absolutely and it is a important to LWG too. We have had discussions > with NearMap in the past. Last discussion with NearMap was passing the > revised Contributor Terms 1.2.4 to NearMap for their legal review, we > are currently waiting on them. > > Regards > Grant > LWG Member. > > Grant, that sounds like "here are the terms, take it or shove it" you may or may not understand the vernacular, we will but I don't see any evidence of cooperatively trying to reach a solution. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
