On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 20:47:58 +1000 John Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8 April 2011 16:58, Ian Sergeant <[email protected]> wrote: > > Despite your attempts to sidetrack this discussion from the your > > data import to some wider OSM licencing issue, I won't be > > sidetracked here. > > The problem is no one seems to want to answer the hard questions, > everyone that should be dealing with these issues just seem to want to > ignore them and hope they stopped being asked. I don't wish to seem to > be picking on you personally, however someone needs to man up and take > responsibility for their choices or change where OSM-F is headed if > the positions are unsupportable with facts. Let's summarise some very important questions (1) What is the point at which non-ODbL data will be removed? Is it related to number of accounts signed up? Is it related to percentage loss of data? (2) Why can't we go with CC-by-SA 3.0? And if not suitable, why can't we make CC-by-SA 4.0 suitable? _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
