On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, David Murn <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was wondering this question tonight.
[ ... ] > This only shows where there is clear evidence of licence violations > without having to look past the data's tags. [ ... ] > Food for thought "Junk food" at best. ;-) OSM is currently published under CC-By-SA. There is no current "violation", even if what you suggest would be considered a "violation". We already know that some contributors have changesets that they wish to have removed before ODbL publication. That can't be done until Phase 4. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
