----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Weait" <[email protected]>
To: "OSM Australian Talk List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How many NearMap users do you think have accepted the
new CTs and ODbL?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, David Murn <[email protected]>
wrote:
I was wondering this question tonight.
[ ... ]
This only shows where there is clear evidence of licence violations
without having to look past the data's tags.
[ ... ]
Food for thought
"Junk food" at best. ;-) OSM is currently published under CC-By-SA.
There is no current "violation", even if what you suggest would be
considered a "violation". We already know that some contributors have
But I thought that Nearmap has said that they did not think the CT's were
compatible with the use of their data. As I understood it this had nothing
to do with CC-BY-SA or ODbL.
So the issue as I understand it is the CT's, and so anyone who has used
Nearmap as a source and has agreed to the CT's is in violation of both
Nearmap's licence, and the CT's.
Of course my understanding of Nearmap's position may be wrong, and I suspect
they (Ben?) will be able to clarify matters.
Regards
David
changesets that they wish to have removed before ODbL publication.
That can't be done until Phase 4.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
