Sam

Underlaying your attacks is the notion that I dismiss people who disagree with 
me, or that I can't understand different points of view. I find that strange 
given my rational responses to several disagreements on this list and outlaying 
where I feel misunderstandings have come from. I have also agreed with the 
points of view of several people but still shared why I came to a different 
conclusion while still understanding their perspective. Thus, it's difficult to 
understand why you feel I'm being dismissive.

Steve

stevecoast.com

PS -  Your ad hominem attack, while not bad, isn't as piercing as the good old 
days on the talk@ list. If you go back over that list I'm sure you can find 
much stronger words than "brat" used. By using those old posts you should be 
able to construct far more cutting and personal jibes. Perhaps mention my 
mother, or the size of my genitalia. By doing so, I'm sure you will achieve 
your goals.

PPS - I too was adolescent and used to attach PGP fingerprints to my e-mails. 
It's sad we don't use more encryption.

On Jul 8, 2011, at 2:28, Sam Couter <s...@couter.id.au> wrote:

> Steve Coast <st...@asklater.com> wrote:
> 
> [ rubbish about Australians being led astray by some guy]
> 
>> It's hard to fix that, however I am resourceful.
> 
> You're an immature brat who thinks shouting loudest and longest means
> you win the argument. That's not resourcefulness.
> 
> It's impossible to carry on any kind of rational debate with someone who
> can't comprehend that others may disagree with them.
> 
>> The first step is to meet your clownmails message-for-message so you don't
>> automatically have the loudest voice. By pointing out the simple facts and
>> having you talk past them and get to the real issues (you want to rile people
>> like me up, make us fret and worry) it is now clear to a rational observer 
>> what
>> the intentions are.
> 
> Here's what this rational and until now unengaged observer sees: You are a
> closed-minded person who assumes people who disagree with you are doing it
> for the lulz rather than because they genuinely have a different opinion. I
> don't know who 80n is or what he's done, so don't dismiss my opinion as just
> another rube being led astray.
> 
>> I think your nightmare scenario is that I fly to Australia and sit in the pub
>> and discuss the real reasons you're so upset.
> 
> Please do so. Your communication skills in this medium are atrocious,
> maybe in person you're not such an arse.
> -- 
> Sam Couter         |  mailto:s...@couter.id.au
> OpenPGP fingerprint:  A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05  5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to