On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Steve Coast <[email protected]> wrote: >> At this point really the positive gestures need to come from you, for >> example helping us switch so we can all (including FOSM) move on. > > If the only way you are willing to have a mutually beneficial > relationship is if I/we/FOSM/CommonMap agree to help you switch to a > license that I/we/FOSM/CommonMap do not approve, then it's not going > to happen. > > I cannot support a switch to the ODbL. But I am very much willing and > interested in supporting OSMF in its larger goal of mapping the world. > > Anthony
In case you missed my previous email to explaining this (and for the benefit of those who didn't receive it), my main sticking point is this: "If you publicly use any adapted version of this database, or works produced from an adapted database, you must also offer that adapted database under the ODbL." I find that to be completely infeasible from a technical standpoint. I don't keep around copies of my adapted databases after I create a produced work from it. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
