On 7 September 2011 11:55, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > What I'm talking about here is a "route" relation. I'm arguing that we > > don't need a named route relation called the Princes Highway. > > But your argument consists of "I can't decide which roads should make > up the relation, so let's delete the relation". > > No, I'm not say I can't decide. I'm say that there is no basis that I can see for anyone to make such a decision. An actual connected route along roads on the ground in this instance either doesn't exist or cannot be determined from any verifiable source. OSM requires verifiability<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability>, for reasons I consider apparent. A route relation requires that there be an actual, connected route. On both these points, this isn't appropriate for a route relation. Princes Highway is part of route 1. > This isn't helpful. National Route 1 and the Princes Hwy diverge at many points. National Route 1 follows the Southern Freeway south from Sydney for a start. Ian.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
