On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Chris Barham <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > Making the licence negotiation details public could hand to those who > do not have good intentions towards OSM, potential tools to try and > damage the project.
Wow. If this is true, then the situation is worse than I thought. Is the only option left for OSMF to withhold this kind of important information from contributors? That's not the sort of community I want to be a part of. :-( Anyway, if I understand correctly, I don't think anyone cares about the "negotiation details", but rather we want to see the final, formal document authorised by the necessary parties. Regardless of how scared OSMF is of detractors, I think such a document is still a valid request of contributors/supporters (like me). _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
