On 31 October 2011 11:18, 80n <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Sam Couter <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Liz <[email protected]> wrote: >> > The answer from AGIMO (data.gov.au) will actually be irrelevant. >> >> I was hoping that the original communications would make clear exactly >> how relevant they are. At the moment we're all just guessing. >> > Based on the reply that I received from Grant, he appears to have no > intention of providing any information to back up his claims. > > It's over a month since he was asked to provide the supporting evidence. I > think we can conclude that he doesn't have it. >
80n you are not a member of the Australian community. You are here to cause trouble and discontent within the Australian community along with your forking friends from the sharedmap and fosm lists. Please, if you truely believe CC-BY-SA 2.0 to be the best license, go and make FOSM.org to be the best mapping project ever.... Please stop all your inane codswallop and mistruths. Mike of Licensing Working Group has had a number of contacts with data.gov.au and what we received in response is strongly believed to be acceptable permission to use their data and the LWG has reported as such. Regards Grant On behalf of myself. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
