It's hard to do a large roundabout like that from gps data as you would have to drive down all the paths to get the traces. I would mark it as a mini roundabout too and let someone who cares more go and do the actual traces to draw it properly.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Ross Scanlon <[email protected]> wrote: > Just came across this: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?**lat=-32.651744&lon=115.86618&**zoom=18<http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-32.651744&lon=115.86618&zoom=18> > > There is no way in the world that this is a mini roundabout. > > Here is the nearmap imagery for it, I know it can't be used now for osm > but using it here for reference: > > http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-**32.650947,115.86584&z=17&t=k&**nmd=20110705<http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-32.650947,115.86584&z=17&t=k&nmd=20110705> > > Why do people not comply with this: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/**wiki/Australian_Tagging_** > Guidelines#Roundabouts<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roundabouts> > > and read the wiki in regards to mini_roundabouts > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/**wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_**roundabout<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout> > > and it's not tagged with clockwise=yes as required for Australia as well. > > As to the source of this it would have to be survey, unless they are > illegally using nearmap as a source as the secondary road and roundabout > are new and not on bing imagery. The secondary road and roundabout were > under construction in Feb 2011 and completed by July 2011. > > Cheers > Ross > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-au<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au> > -- bitcoin <http://www.bitcoin.org/>: 1HHKwJdd8vmdZg25tWhUqHhdgQQS7dgxq5
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
