Hi, But that is different to what you said in your original email, and different to what it says on the wiki page you originally referenced.
So given those three choices, I think I tend to agree with the view on the mini_roundabout wiki page you cited originally. Adding the same tag to every object type in a country doesn't seem like work for a human, to me. Conveniently, if you disagree, there is a wiki page that supports your position too! http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout Ian. On 3 November 2011 20:36, Ross Scanlon <[email protected]> wrote: > As per here: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/**wiki/Key:direction<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction> > > mini_roundabouts are rendered by default as anti-clockwise so if they > existed in Australia we would have to add direction=clockwise. > > Cheers > Ross > > > On 03/11/11 12:37, Ian Sergeant wrote: > >> On 2 November 2011 23:54, Ross Scanlon <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> and read the wiki in regards to mini_roundabouts >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/**__wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini___** >> roundabout<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini___roundabout> >> >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.**org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_**roundabout<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout> >> > >> >> and it's not tagged with clockwise=yes as required for Australia as >> well. >> >> >> I read it. >> >> The wiki says clockwise isn't required, and even if it was the tag would >> have been direction=clockwise. >> >> Of course this may only reflect the viewpoint of the person who happened >> to update it, I'm not sure. >> >> Ian. >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-au<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
