Problem with this is that you are breaching copyright.
This is the same as what the user did with the data in Sydney and it was
removed by the data working group.
It's also what Frederik was discussing on the talk list in regards
to NE2.
You are not resolving the issue of the original data being provided by a
non valid source. You can only do this if you remove the non compliant
data and remap with totally new source, gps, bing, etc.
Cheers
Ross
On 15/12/11 12:34, Ian Sergeant wrote:
Certainly it is astoundingly clear to me.
For a couple of objects, I've just copied the v1 object, deleted the
current object, and reloaded into OSM with an attribution tag for the v1
author. It isn't too many clicks to do this in JOSM, but tidying up
around the edges (linking the object) is a little time consuming. If
there is no interest from anyone with db rights to do this, there would
be potential to develop this method further via the API.
Ian.
On 15 December 2011 15:12, Ben Kelley <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi.
I think it's clear we need an automated way to remove
non-new-ct-accepting edits from ways where v1 was by an acceptor.
Even assuming the trace data is in OSM there is still an immense
amount of work needed to "cleanse" these ways.
- Ben Kelley.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
