But I was quoting and responding directly to Ben's email, where he said "I think it's clear we need an automated way to remove non-new-ct-accepting edits from ways where v1 was by an acceptor".
I was proposing a manual way through the API to kinda achieve this, which could be partly scripted. Assuming nobody with db rights comes to our assistance. Ian. On 15 December 2011 18:31, Ross Scanlon <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. > > You made no mention of the V1 object being from a CT accepting user in > your original posting. > > Cheers > Ross > > > > On 15/12/11 14:40, Ian Sergeant wrote: > >> No I'm not. I think you may be misunderstanding what I am doing. >> >> If the v1 object author has agreed to the CTs, but the v2 author has >> not, I simply delete the object, load the v1 object directly, make my >> changes, link the object and attribute the v1 author using the >> attribution tag. >> >> No copyright breach. I'm only using CT compliant data, I'm not even >> looking at the non compliant object, and I'm attributing as is polite >> and required. >> >> Ian >> >> On Dec 15, 2011 5:16 PM, "Ross Scanlon" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-au<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au> >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-au<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
