On 27/12/2011, at 12:03 AM, Nick Hocking wrote: > Since the ABS boundary data has to be removed anyway, does anyone see any > problem with doing it now (in bits and pieces). > > Doing so would make the job of remapping the tainted data a lot easier.
I don't have an objection to the boundaries going - although I would remove the unedited ways first, leaving any ways subsequently edited for later deletion (e.g. waterway tag added). It would be nice to have a list of ways like this so they can be separated from the ABS data prior to deletion. (Any volunteers for this?) Mark P.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
