Mark wrote >On 27/12/2011, at 12:03 AM, Nick Hocking wrote: >>* Since the ABS boundary data has to be removed anyway, does anyone see any problem with doing it now (in bits and pieces). *>* *>* Doing so would make the job of remapping >>the tainted data a lot easier. * >I don't have an objection to the boundaries going - although I would remove the unedited ways first, leaving any ways subsequently edited for later deletion (e.g. waterway tag >added). It would be nice to have a list of ways like this so they can be separated from the ABS data prior to deletion. (Any volunteers for this?)
>Mark P. Yes indeed, I've being doing just that, although I did manage to recover part of Tumut river after deleting some interfering ABS ways. It had been realigned to the ABS data (or vice versa) but the Bing imagery was adequate to remap it. There is a lot more of Tumut river to disentangle from the ABS data and I will eventually get round to it. If no one else has produced a list of edited ABS ways then I will do so on the weekend. I could do it right now simply by AWKing through a planet file but I want to relearn how to use osmosis properly. Nick
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
