On 1/04/2012 2:16 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Richard Colless<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm not taking out any resentment on anybody. I'm simply choosing not to
participate. So don't say that I'm hurting anybody.. I'm quite happy for any
of my data to remain. If someone else chooses to delete it, blame them for
any hurt, not me.
I haven't heard from you regarding your API screen name or
registration email, so I can't provide any details about when LWG
attempted to contact you. LWG attempted to contact every data
contributor. Individual mappers have reached out to other local
mappers as well.
I can't guess why you didn't see an email but I'll look into it if
you'd like to find out. Other mappers have run into the following:
- they don't check that email any more.
- their email changed but they didn't update the contact email at osm.org
- email was received and diverted by a spam filter
- perhaps others that I don't recall at the moment
I'm really not that concerned as to why I didn't receive any e-mails. My
reason for declining the new CT's is the disgraceful way that OSM has
treated mappers. I'll put my mapping efforts into somewhere more worthwhile.
As to your suggestions:
My e-mail address has remained the same for the last 15 years or so
I run several junk filters, and check their contents for incorrect
diversions before I delete them
Any other guesses?
Richard
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
