Hi Ian, I don't think "unsealed" communicates anything that "unpaved" doesn't. If people want to be specific with surface=dirt, surface=gravel then that would be different.
So - yes, go ahead. :) Steve On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Ian Sergeant <inas66+...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I know we had some discussion over 4wd/dirt road tagging. > > This ended up in the wiki as a recommendation to use > > surface=unsealed > > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/surface=unsealed > > I really can't see a significant reason here not to stick with > > surface=unpaved > > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/surface=unpaved > > When it is so much more likely to used, and therefore so much more likely to > be rendered, navigated, etc. There are the other surface=* tags that can be > used if more specific information is available, but surface=unsealed is > obscure to no benefit IMO. > > If there are no objections, I'll update the wiki. > > Thanks, > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au