I would send them the odbl licence and position it as 'is this ok with your open government stance? '
neatly avoids cc by confusion, gives them an attitude to address, and likely ends up with 'let it be free' On 17/09/2013 4:53 PM, "Li Xia" <[email protected]> wrote: > Gday everyone, > > I've been talking to DSE about importing vicmap data into OSM under the CC > license. Got this reply today... > > "The Creative Commons licence requires you to Attribute the work/data as > being Vicmap Data. We would like to sit down with you at some stage in > early October and discuss the inclusion of Vicmap into OSM.? > > I'm not a legal buff, but if someone is, would you like to join me for > this meeting? > > Li. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
