Sounds straight forward. thanks for the help.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]>wrote: > Also: clarify explicitly that attribution in the wiki is acceptable to > them. > On 17/09/2013 6:43 PM, "Daniel O'Connor" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would send them the odbl licence and position it as 'is this ok with >> your open government stance? ' >> >> neatly avoids cc by confusion, gives them an attitude to address, and >> likely ends up with 'let it be free' >> On 17/09/2013 4:53 PM, "Li Xia" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Gday everyone, >>> >>> I've been talking to DSE about importing vicmap data into OSM under the >>> CC license. Got this reply today... >>> >>> "The Creative Commons licence requires you to Attribute the work/data >>> as being Vicmap Data. We would like to sit down with you at some stage >>> in early October and discuss the inclusion of Vicmap into OSM.? >>> >>> I'm not a legal buff, but if someone is, would you like to join me for >>> this meeting? >>> >>> Li. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-au mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>> >>>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
