On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:41:29 +1100 Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Daniel O'Connor > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I started out with buildings, but got a bit excited in my local area; > > getting down into trees, power lines, fences, driveways etc. > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-34.84928/138.52277 > > > > Not super pretty looking. > > > > Hi guys, > Personally I'm not that into micromapping, but could I make the > suggestion that you use (additional) tags to make it easy to filter this > stuff out? It makes it hard to render a reasonable map if there's no > distinction between, say: > * relevant public buildings, vs private houses (use building=house sounds > good) > * walking paths through parks, vs ordinary footpaths (use sidewalk=yes?) > * public or semi-public tennis courts (eg at a sporting facility, vs > private tennis courts in backyards (access=private?) > * similarly for swimming pools > My tuppence worth: It would (possibly) be useful to map significant private homes otherwise just tag the blocks as residential area. mick _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
