Ok ...
The reason why I'm look at these turn restrictions .. there is a section
- 2 nodes that give an error of overlapping ways .. one road .. finally
worked it out.. put another node on it and dragged it off - to reveal
the overlap - a circular way .. consisting of two nodes.. fixed that now.
Back to the turn restrictions: I've removed the 'group';. Put in two (or
more?) restrictions on individual nodes .. from my previews OSM garmin
map that I have. If the renderer has not resolved the original intended
turn restrictions then that is a further reason for going with
individual turn restrictions rather than a 'group' where one turn
restriction has multiple vias, froms and tos. Working on the KISS
principle. Thought, would someone combining a number of ways into one
way, join the turn restrictions into one turn restriction to make this
mess?
In doing this I expanded 'my' area .. and that has now revealed more
errors - both overlapping ways and more turn restrictions stuff .. I
fixed what I could work out in a given time .. but I've left the rest ...
Authors appear to be cleary, Alexonthebus and OSMF Redactivation
account. Area is Pennant Hills Road - North Parramatta to Carlingford,
Sydney.
On 30/01/2014 10:22 AM, Warin wrote:
Hi,
On the corner of 'my area' I've a restriction .. that has multiple
'from' and multiple 'to' ... I thought that was a mistake ... but it
may not be. The via was indicated as 'incomplete' .. that may just
reflect that my area does not include all of the vias? It is confusing
to me. Possibly this is a long string of 'no right turns' all combined
into one restriction. It would be clearer to me if they were all
individual restrictions - and this would reduce the possibility of
confusion in the future?
So my question is .. what is the preference for multiple restrictions
on consecutive turns? Tag as one, or individual restriction/s?
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
