On 16 April 2015 at 15:26, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/15/2015 6:01 AM, Ross wrote: > >> Hi Simon, >> >> The issue is not with the licence. The current terms and conditions >> require permission to add data not owned by the contributor. >> > This is incorrect. An appropriate license is sufficient. Some obviously > appropriate licenses are CC0, PDDL, ODC-BY and the ODbL itself. > > The issue is that CC BY (and BY-SA) 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 require a form of > attribution that is not practical for most map uses, so we need permission. > This would have been true even without the license change, as we were never > meeting the requirements of those versions of CC BY. > > We have permission for many Australian sources, and I believe for all CC > BY Australian sources that were in use at the time of the license change. >
Thanks for clarifying this Paul. Does CC-BY 4.0 have the same issue? What specific permission do we need? Do we essentially need the data supplier to agree to CC0 plus attribution in some specific form. Is there a sample legal agreement or text for this?
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
