On 16/04/15 15:51, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On 16 April 2015 at 15:26, Paul Norman <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 4/15/2015 6:01 AM, Ross wrote:
Hi Simon,
The issue is not with the licence. The current terms and
conditions require permission to add data not owned by the
contributor.
This is incorrect. An appropriate license is sufficient. Some
obviously appropriate licenses are CC0, PDDL, ODC-BY and the ODbL
itself.
The issue is that CC BY (and BY-SA) 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 require a
form of attribution that is not practical for most map uses, so we
need permission. This would have been true even without the
license change, as we were never meeting the requirements of those
versions of CC BY.
So where is the link that clarifies this on the wiki or where ever?
We have permission for many Australian sources, and I believe for
all CC BY Australian sources that were in use at the time of the
license change.
Thanks for clarifying this Paul. Does CC-BY 4.0 have the same issue?
What specific permission do we need? Do we essentially need the data
supplier to agree to CC0 plus attribution in some specific form. Is
there a sample legal agreement or text for this?
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
