On 3 May 2015 at 15:27, Warin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Whatever way it is cut there is a 'responsiblity', and I'd rather see the > 'rules' and have the mapper make the choice from local knowledge rather > than pass it to some remote person who can only judge it from a yes/no > answer. > > > I'm in also in favour of subjective decisions, when we need a subjective decision, to be made close to the source. However, there are some tags that simply aim to group objective facts by applying a ruleset to them. From the description this looks like one of those cases. I look to see what amenity a campsite has, look up the proposal, and decide on a category to assign it to. I can choose to list the amenities too if I want. People might misinterpret the ruleset, and meanwhile, we are losing hard data about the amenities. Is there supposed to be a subjective step that I'm missing? That is you look at all the amenity, and make a judgement call on the category? Ian.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
