I've also asked on legal-talk to try to find out what extra
permissions on top of CC-BY are needed for potential inclusion in OSM
at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2015-May/008127.html

On 5 May 2015 at 20:37, Phil (The Geek) Wyatt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> If you have any specific legal questions re ODBL, the OpenStreetMap 
> Foundation's License Working Group can be reached at [email protected] 
> and will be glad to help.
>
>
> Cheers - Phil
> OSM mapper - tastrax
> Kiva Lender, Thin Green Line Supporter, Volunteer Mapper - Red Cross, 
> Wildcare Volunteer
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2015 7:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [talk-au] OSM people in ACT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> Thanks Kristy, I would support the idea of discerning the difference between 
> CCBY and ODBL.  THe intent of the open data policy is to make data useable 
> with minimal restriction, and ODBL seems to be an appropriate instrument for 
> handling this in database format.  CCBY seems ok for maps but not for 
> databases.
>
> I got in touch with OSM contributor Michael Cleary last week who was visiting 
> GA as part of the Power of Maps conference.  He outlined pretty well what he 
> sees the issues are viz ODBL vs CCBY4.0.  I am beginning to get a clearer 
> picture on what these issues are and am keen to get it resolved, but will 
> need continued feedback from the OSM community on this.
>
> This is also worth bringing up in the Foundation Spatial Data Framework 
> policy discussions which I am heavily involved in.  FSDF also needs to 
> consider the role of volunteered geographic information in the update of 
> national foundation spatial datasets - so there is even greater imperative to 
> have OSM involved in those discussions.  The use cases included in the email 
> trail are excellent examples of the need to get this sorted.
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
>
> Simon Costello
> Branch Head, National Location Information  |  EGD Management Environmental 
> Geoscience Division  |  GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Phone:  +61 2 6249 9716<tel:+61%202%206249%209716>    Fax:  +61 2 6249 
> 9999<tel:+61%202%206249%209999>
> Email:  [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>    Web:  
> www.ga.gov.au<http://www.ga.gov.au/>
> Cnr Jerrabomberra Avenue and Hindmarsh Drive Symonston ACT GPO Box 378 
> Canberra ACT 2601 Australia<x-apple-data-detectors://3>
> Applying geoscience to Australia’s most important challenges
>
>
>
> On 5 May 2015, at 5:00 pm, kristy van putten 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jason,
> This is a great tool!
> The majority of government is trying to move to an open license, with GA 
> leading in the geospatial front.  What we need to get our heads around is the 
> difference between CCBY 4.0 and ODBL.
> Community outreach programs would be great, or even potentially working with 
> spatial institutes such as SSSI to encourage OSM in schools.
> I will take a look at the import list and see whats happening around the 
> world - your right this might shed a light on potential assistance.  As 
> Andrew just pointed out access to imagery would also be very beneficial, I 
> will look into this a bit further and see what can be done there (specially 
> ACT to start with).
> I will start to contact the super users in ACT.
> Cheers
>
>
>
> On Tue, 5 May 2015 at 16:44 Jason Ward 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi Kristy,
>
> Not a large userbase in the ACT and not all of them may subscribe to this 
> list.  To help you in your search the following link may prove useful 
> (Suggest unticking Black, Red and Orange users in the top left corner for a 
> closer measure of 'active' contributors)
>
> http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=11&lat=-35.29175&lon=149.17885&layers=B00FFFFFTT
>
> While I don't represent the contributors in ACT it would be great if (the 
> whole of) government was able to provide or make accessible data with 
> suitable licence clearances for use in OSM.  Despite that and noting the 
> small contributor count in the region maybe more 'useful' would be the 
> application of resources to help with the contribution of data OR some sort 
> of government advocacy/community growth initiative with the long game being 
> to build the local contributor base.
>
> To adapt a recent phrase from another list, OSM is a collection of 
> on-the-ground observations and while there is a place for supply of 
> government information, and notwithstanding your Indonesian HOT experience, 
> your time would be well spent looking at some of the imports carried out in 
> other parts of the world (some good, others less so), as well as subscribing 
> to the @imports list (if you haven't done so) for a view into the workings 
> OSM members apply to externally supplied information.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jason
> M: 0438740049<tel:0438740049>
>
> On 5 May 2015 at 16:11, Kristy Van Putten 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am searching for active OSM contributors in ACT, if you are one please 
> email me or contact me via my mobile.  I am interested to get your thoughts 
> on the current state of OSM in ACT and if there is any aspect the government 
> can assist in.
> Cheers
>
> Kristy Van Putten
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> 0414844825<tel:0414844825>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
> Geoscience Australia Disclaimer: This e-mail (and files transmitted with it) 
> is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you 
> are not the intended recipient, then you have received this e-mail by mistake 
> and any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail 
> and its file attachments is prohibited. The security of emails transmitted 
> cannot be guaranteed; by forwarding or replying to this email, you 
> acknowledge and accept these risks.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.5941 / Virus Database: 4339/9697 - Release Date: 05/04/15
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.5941 / Virus Database: 4339/9697 - Release Date: 05/04/15
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to