Yes, as I said landuse doesn't seem to be what I'm after here.
What was the objection to fine grained land ownership in OSM? Seems
like a particularly useful thing to have in. Is it just "imports suck"?
//Mike
--
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
⚙ <http://mjog.vee.net/>
On Sun, 3 Jan, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote:
The Karlsruher Schema is intended for postal addresses, typically the
tags are used on building outlines or on nodes. I wouldn't use them on
landuse boundaries. Nor would I import fine grained land ownership in
the first place (you should be able to find discussion of the pros and
cons on the talk or talk-us mailings lists some time back.
Simon
Am 03.01.2016 um 07:29 schrieb Michael Gratton:
Hey all,
Now that the NSW LPI goldmine is available, I'd like to be able to
tag
individual residential and commercial property boundaries. Looking
at
the wiki, it seems like boundary=administrative isn't applicable and
landuse=... is for larger areas, so is the only useful tagging
scheme
something like:
area=yes
addr:housenumber=...
addr:street=...
But then Karlsruhe says that buildings should be tagged with the
addr:* tags instead?
Any suggestions?
//Mike
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
