On 3/01/2016 9:26 PM, Michael Gratton wrote:
Yes, as I said landuse doesn't seem to be what I'm after here.What was the objection to fine grained land ownership in OSM? Seems like a particularly useful thing to have in. Is it just "imports suck"?//Mike
A simple google search (OSM property boundary) turns up some resultshttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:boundary#Property_.28land_parcel.29_boundaries .. probably will not render.
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=uHIKBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA258&lpg=PA258&dq=OSM+property+boundary&source=bl&ots=SZ055zv2mM&sig=0hgvEPAA_AHov2iNJMm5qvSmUIQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj-3u6bwY3KAhVkIqYKHWXAD1sQ6AEISzAG#v=onepage&q=OSM%20property%20boundary&f=falsehttp://slashgeo.org/2010/09/17/Parcel-Boundary-Data-More-Just-Pretty-Lines-Map/
http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/89236/does-openstreetmap-have-property-boundaries Then OSM parcel boundary (is this an American term?!) https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-February/010398.htmlhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parcel -a summary .. possibly biased .. at least a country bias?
I think it is a boundary of sorts .. thus the appropriate tag is boundary ... possible value? boundary=property?
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
