On 03-Jan-17 04:15 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 3/1/17 13:24, Warin wrote:
Near as I can figure .. your joking.
No I'm being serious. Your proposal is to use level 6 to map the
entity "that performs the function of a 'local government authority'".
In the case of the western part of NSW this is the New South Wales
Government.
That said , and example would be the name used for nsw western bit
name = Unincorporated Area of Western NSW could be appropriate
No, that would be a description. There is no entity called
"Unincorporated Area of Western NSW".
It is a name.
Another sample ..
https://digitalfarwestnsw.com.au/government-services/the-unincorporated-area-of-far-west-nsw-2/
"Unincorporated Area of Far West NSW"
... run
by the Western Lands Commission - part of the NSW Dept of
Environment.... ?
That's still a description and also not correct.
Ok on the Dept/Commission thing.. must be a historic thing .. found on
the web.
This http://www.crownland.nsw.gov.au/crown_lands/western_region
says "In these areas, which include the villages of Silverton,
Tibooburra, and Milparinka, the Department of Industry - Lands (the
Department) assists in co-ordinating various community services."
I do wonder if that is current ... copyright says 2010.
So rather than the whole NSW Government .. it could be the NSW
Department of Industry - Lands.
------------------------------------
Some names are descriptive, and we are the better for it. Tibooburra for
instance.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
