The bit that worries me about these 3 listings is that the addresses that can be found by searching, don't match up with the locations shown
Thanks Graeme On 27 May 2017 at 11:08, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I have deleted these in the past, eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/ > changeset/47218168 > > I believe that they should be deleted on the principle of Verifiability > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability > "OSM data should, as far as is reasonably possible, be verifiable ... a > tag/value combination is verifiable if and only if independent users when > observing the same feature would make the same observation every time" > > I would support deletion if these conditions were all met: > > a) it feels wrong (eg a tag in the middle of a road or an empty field) > b) no address tags in node > c) their website "Contact" does not include a physical address and > d) no reply to changeset comments > > And as Warin says: Remember this may be their first contact with and > mapping in OSM ... go easy. > > Tony > > > These edits are just nodes of a business placed on a road without a >> physical building coincidentally mapped. >> Is this allowed? >> Does a business need to have a physical building presence to be included >> in OSM? >> If these nodes were placed near the road instead would that be ok? >> >> *Corrected link:* https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TechTronix% >> 20Webmaster/history#map=17/-26.52661/153.08892 < >> http://www.oznativeplants.com/plantdetail/Lawyer-Vine/Calam >> us/muelleri/zz.html> >> >> One is an extra node on top of a junction node. >> >> >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
