On 13 March 2018 at 19:47, Simon Poole <[email protected]> wrote: > > * a small note on the side, when discussing ODbL and CC BY 4.0 > compatibility with Creative Commons, representatives of the organisation > voiced the opinion that most of the rewrite was just clarification of > terms that the previous versions contained, in particular that the > attribution requirement had always allowed indirect attribution if it > was the appropriate choice. > > OK, a stupid, well & truly outside the box, thought here! :-)
If we have discussions with CC, is there any possibility of getting them to write into CC BY 4.5 & following editions, that "by the Organisation agreeing to the terms of CC BY xx, that they also agree to ODbl" or something to that effect? Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
