Am 14.03.2018 um 22:50 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick: > > > OK, a stupid, well & truly outside the box, thought here! :-) > > If we have discussions with CC, is there any possibility of getting > them to write into CC BY 4.5 & following editions, that "by the > Organisation agreeing to the terms of CC BY xx, that they also agree > to ODbl" or something to that effect? > Hahaha :-)
Well CC BY 4.0 might have actually been that if they (all IMHO now) hadn't given in to the group that didn't want to agree to parallel distribution being an allowed method to guarantee that the underlying data remains open (I spent a fair amount of time two years back reading all the publicly available discussion leading up to 4.0, and a frequent statement in the context was that "everybody ignores it anyway" (it == the DRM prohibition)). We would still have the attribution problem, but that is, as this discussion shows, in general not an issue. Simon > Graeme > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
