Correct, alternatively the AU OSM community could set up an instance of the task manager to support community projects.
Cheers - Phil, On the road with his iPad > On 17 Jun 2018, at 11:47 am, Dion Moult <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wow, seems a little overkill to put the task there where it seems the > objective is for humanitarian needs :) Australian house addresses are hardly > humanitarian in nature :) > > Dion Moult > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >> On June 17, 2018 9:30 AM, Phil Wyatt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You could put a project up on the HOT Task manager as a low priority and >> then send folks the link >> >> https://tasks.hotosm.org/contribute?difficulty=ALL >> >> >> Cheers - Phil, >> On the road with his iPad >> >> On 16 Jun 2018, at 10:29 pm, Dion Moult <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> As a continuation of this thread just wondering if there was a way to >>> divide up Sydney into a grid and automatically check the progress of >>> whether that zone has been mapped or not. Is there a standard approach for >>> this? >>> >>> >>> >>> Dion Moult >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> On 6 Jun 2018, 09:39, Warin < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 06/06/18 08:51, Dion Moult wrote: >>> > Thanks Andrew et all, >>> > >>> > Yes, I have used the ESRI imagery layer. Thanks for the heads up of the >>> > LPI base map. Before I go too far, can one of you please look at the work >>> > I've done so far if I'm doing things correctly? Here is a small sample in >>> > the suburb of Epping that I have traced houses and added addresses: >>> > >>> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-33.78071/151.06628 >>> > >>> > In that scenario I did not trace off the LPI imagery, but instead traced >>> > off ESRI. I noticed if I enable the LPI imagery, the houses don't line >>> > up. Should this be fixed? If so, what's the best way? >>> >>> >>> Any imagery can have a 'offset' from where it should be. And that offset >>> will vary as you go up and down hills. >>> >>> The LPI Imagery has much better resolution and less parallax error than the >>> other sources .. I prefer it to any other images for its accuracy. >>> >>> That said it is usefull to check with other images for more up to date >>> things. I found in Coffs Harbour that the DigitalGlobe stuff is more >>> current. >>> >>> >>> I'll leave others to comment on that address stuff.. no expert on that >>> (yet). :) >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-au mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-au mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
