There are a number of task manger instances run outside of HOT (which
would really really not be an appropriate one). It's on the other side
of the world but please feel free to use our (SOSM) instance 
http://tasks.osm.ch/ (which is currently mainly used for coordinating an
address import).

Simon

PS: while I have your attention maybe somebody wants to weigh in on
https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/8ra1x2/android_apps_that_do_navigation_well/


Am 17.06.2018 um 01:30 schrieb Phil Wyatt:
> You could put a project up on the HOT Task manager as a low priority
> and then send folks the link
>
> https://tasks.hotosm.org/contribute?difficulty=ALL
>
>
> Cheers - Phil, 
> On the road with his iPad 
>
> On 16 Jun 2018, at 10:29 pm, Dion Moult <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>>
>> As a continuation of this thread just wondering if there was a way to
>> divide up Sydney into a grid and automatically check the progress of
>> whether that zone has been mapped or not. Is there a standard
>> approach for this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dion Moult
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> On 6 Jun 2018, 09:39, Warin < [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     On 06/06/18 08:51, Dion Moult wrote:
>>     > Thanks Andrew et all,
>>     >
>>     > Yes, I have used the ESRI imagery layer. Thanks for the heads
>>     up of the LPI base map. Before I go too far, can one of you
>>     please look at the work I've done so far if I'm doing things
>>     correctly? Here is a small sample in the suburb of Epping that I
>>     have traced houses and added addresses:
>>     >
>>     > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-33.78071/151.06628
>>     >
>>     > In that scenario I did not trace off the LPI imagery, but
>>     instead traced off ESRI. I noticed if I enable the LPI imagery,
>>     the houses don't line up. Should this be fixed? If so, what's the
>>     best way?
>>
>>
>>     Any imagery can have a 'offset' from where it should be. And that
>>     offset will vary as you go up and down hills.
>>
>>     The LPI Imagery has much better resolution and less parallax
>>     error than the other sources .. I prefer it to any other images
>>     for its accuracy.
>>
>>     That said it is usefull to check with other images for more up to
>>     date things. I found in Coffs Harbour that the DigitalGlobe stuff
>>     is more current.
>>
>>
>>     I'll leave others to comment on that address stuff.. no expert on
>>     that (yet). :)
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Talk-au mailing list
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to