Good point Phil, I've added a description tag and a few of the documented flood prone tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/257707539
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 09:19, Phil Wyatt <[email protected]> wrote: > Given the level of publicity/invitation of the area I think its fair to > have it on the map. It would be worth adding some warning/risk information > if possible given concern for walkers in the area > > > > > https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/things-to-do/lookouts/figure-eight-pools > > > > Cheers - Phil > > > > *From:* Andrew Harvey [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, 29 August 2018 11:28 PM > *To:* OSM Australian Talk List > *Subject:* [talk-au] Unmarked tracks (Figure of Eight Pools, NSW) > > > > I'm seeking some feedback from the community about the way at > https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/157934548 should it exist > in OSM? > > > > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/22832546277/in/datetaken-public/ > > > > There isn't really any marked track on the ground, which is a big reason > to not include, however it is a path in the sense that it's a way that > people follow pretty much every day or at least every weekend in droves, it > just hasn't formed a track that you can see like other bush tracks because > shoes don't ware away bear rock that fast compared to dirt! It's verifiable > and surveyable by observing people follow the path. The fact that it's > unmarked is recorded by trail_visibility=no (a documented and used tag) and > that it's over rock by the surface tag. > > I'm vocal about not tagging for the renderer or routed, but from a map > rendering and routing perspective it's desired to have this way in OSM. > > > > Thoughts? > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
