I just checked again, it looks like you haven't corrected this yet, so a friendly reminder it would be nice to have this fixed. I think it's also a good idea to include the NSW LPI Imagery as the default background layer for this task. I just filed https://github.com/osmlab/maproulette3/issues/572 in relation to this. On Sun, 9 Dec 2018, at 4:53 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Andrew H-- correct and I wasn't suggesting that you amend it yourself > :) I will make the update when I find a moment.> Andrew H/D -- thanks for > pointing me to the import plan. > -- > Martijn van Exel > [email protected] > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, at 17:29, Andrew Harvey wrote: >> On Sat., 8 Dec. 2018, 10:38 am Martijn van Exel <[email protected] wrote: >>> That is a good point. The query would probably be easy enough to >>> modify.>>> Something like this... >>> >>> [timeout:190]; >>> area[name=“New South Wales"]->.a; >>> way[highway~"motorway|trunk|primary"][!lanes][!"lanes:forward"][!"l- >>> anes:backward"](area.a);>>> out body geom qt; >> >> Yeah but I don't think I can modify your maproulette challenge, are >> you able to?>>> >>> I think it needs to be pre-processed a bit more to weed out the very >>> short segments. And perhaps work on areas where lanes actually >>> matter (urban) first.>>> >>> I was looking at how to slice that and got interested in the status >>> of administrative boundary relations for Australia. It seems to be >>> inconsistent, for example in South Australia there is pretty good >>> (but not complete) coverage of admin_level=6 >>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/EmZ and even one admin_level=8 >>> (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/En0) but in other states the >>> admin_level=6 coverage is pretty sparse or absent >>> (https://imgur.com/a/gmUJs2r, query at >>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/En1 but watch out, it’s a lot of data). >>> If you all think this is useful to fix / complete perhaps we can set >>> up a page to coordinate. I’m happy to help.>> >> There's another thread ongoing on this list about importing suburb, >> localities and LGA boundaries.>>> >>> -- >>> Martijn van Exel >>> [email protected] >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, at 17:23, Andrew Harvey wrote: >>>> Overall I think it's a great idea. >>>> >>>> Could you filter out ways that have lanes:forward and >>>> lanes:backward?>>>> eg. >>>> https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3375/task/6686753 which >>>> shouldn't need a redundant lanes tag as you can just add them up. >>>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 10:49, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> wrote:>>>>> >>>>> Hi folks. >>>>> I created MapRoulette challenge asking mappers to look at aerial >>>>> images and add lane tags to major roads.>>>>> >>>>> https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3375 >>>>> This particular one is for NSW but can easily be ‘cloned’ for >>>>> other regions.>>>>> I wanted to get your opinion on this — good / bad >>>>> idea? Can it be >>>>> improved? Smaller regions? Any feedback welcome.>>>>> Martijn >>>>> >>>>> PS the Overpass Query this is based on is: >>>>> >>>>> [timeout:190]; >>>>> area[name="New South Wales"]->.a; >>>>> way[highway~"motorway|trunk|primary"][!lanes](area.a); >>>>> out body geom qt; >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-au mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > _________________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
