Hi,  
 
The source is on Github (search for mapoulette3 for the frontend / react code 
and maproulette2 for the backend / scala codebase) but you don't need to dig 
into that to simply create a challenge. You can log onto MapRoulette using your 
OSM account, and create a challenge using an Overpass query. I wrote a diary on 
how to do this a little while ago, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/46863  
 
If you don't know any Overpass, I'm more than happy to set a Challenge of your 
preference up for you, or show you how to do it.  
 
I did in fact set up an 'add lanes' challenge for Queensland a little while 
ago, which you can find here: 
https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3376 
 
-- 
 Martijn van Exel 
 m...@rtijn.org 
 
 
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018, at 04:20, Joel H. wrote: 
> Hey I'm not familiar with MapRoulette. 

> Where can I view the source code? I (or maybe you could) would like to 
> perhaps make one for QLD. 

> If you are interested, I would choose Bing by default, but really none are 
> perfect. 

> On 12/12/18 3:54 am, Martijn van Exel wrote: 
>> Thanks. Because you cannot edit the Overpass query for an existing 
>> challenge, I created a new one that has the LPI imagery as default backdrop. 
>>  
>> The challenge lives here: https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3387 
>>  
>> It has 9800+ tasks.  
>> I deleted the old one. 
>> Thanks for the suggestions! 
>> Martijn 
>>  
>>> On Dec 11, 2018, at 5:31 AM, Andrew Harvey <and...@alantgeo.com.au> wrote: 
>>>  
>>> I just checked again, it looks like you haven't corrected this yet, so a 
>>> friendly reminder it would be nice to have this fixed. 
>>>  
>>> I think it's also a good idea to include the NSW LPI Imagery as the default 
>>> background layer for this task. I just filed 
>>> https://github.com/osmlab/maproulette3/issues/572 in relation to this. 
>>>  
>>> On Sun, 9 Dec 2018, at 4:53 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: 
>>>> Andrew H-- correct and I wasn't suggesting that you amend it yourself :) I 
>>>> will make the update when I find a moment. 
>>>> Andrew H/D -- thanks for pointing me to the import plan.  
>>>> -- 
>>>>  Martijn van Exel 
>>>>  m...@rtijn.org 
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, at 17:29, Andrew Harvey wrote: 
>>>>> On Sat., 8 Dec. 2018, 10:38 am Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org wrote: 
>>>>>> That is a good point. The query would probably be easy enough to modify. 
>>>>>> Something like this... 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> [timeout:190]; 
>>>>>> area[name=“New South Wales"]->.a; 
>>>>>> way[highway~"motorway|trunk|primary"][!lanes][!"lanes:forward"][!"lanes:backward"](area.a);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> out body geom qt; 
>>>>>  
>>>>> Yeah but I don't think I can modify your maproulette challenge, are you 
>>>>> able to? 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> I think it needs to be pre-processed a bit more to weed out the very 
>>>>>> short segments. And perhaps work on areas where lanes actually matter 
>>>>>> (urban) first. 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> I was looking at how to slice that and got interested in the status of 
>>>>>> administrative boundary relations for Australia. It seems to be 
>>>>>> inconsistent, for example in South Australia there is pretty good (but 
>>>>>> not complete) coverage of admin_level=6 http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/EmZ 
>>>>>> and even one admin_level=8 (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/En0) but in other 
>>>>>> states the admin_level=6 coverage is pretty sparse or absent 
>>>>>> (https://imgur.com/a/gmUJs2r, query at http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/En1 
>>>>>> but watch out, it’s a lot of data). If you all think this is useful to 
>>>>>> fix / complete perhaps we can set up a page to coordinate. I’m happy to 
>>>>>> help.  
>>>>>  
>>>>> There's another thread ongoing on this list about importing suburb, 
>>>>> localities and LGA boundaries.  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> --  
>>>>>>  Martijn van Exel 
>>>>>>  m...@rtijn.org 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, at 17:23, Andrew Harvey wrote: 
>>>>>>> Overall I think it's a great idea. 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Could you filter out ways that have lanes:forward and lanes:backward? 
>>>>>>> eg. https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3375/task/6686753 which 
>>>>>>> shouldn't need a redundant lanes tag as you can just add them up. 
>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 10:49, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: 
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> Hi folks. 
>>>>>>>> I created MapRoulette challenge asking mappers to look at aerial 
>>>>>>>> images and add lane tags to major roads. 
>>>>>>>> https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3375 
>>>>>>>> This particular one is for NSW but can easily be ‘cloned’ for other 
>>>>>>>> regions. 
>>>>>>>> I wanted to get your opinion on this — good / bad idea? Can it be 
>>>>>>>> improved? Smaller regions? Any feedback welcome. 
>>>>>>>> Martijn 
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> PS the Overpass Query this is based on is: 
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> [timeout:190]; 
>>>>>>>> area[name="New South Wales"]->.a; 
>>>>>>>> way[highway~"motorway|trunk|primary"][!lanes](area.a); 
>>>>>>>> out body geom qt; 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>>>>>> Talk-au mailing list 
>>>>>>>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org 
>>>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au 
>>>>  
>>>> _________________________________________________ 
>>>> Talk-au mailing list 
>>>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org 
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au 
>>>  
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>  Talk-au mailing list 
>>>  Talk-au@openstreetmap.org 
>>>  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au 
>>  
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Talk-au mailing list 
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au 
>  
 
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to