For me, split ways means that there is some barrier between the two.
If there is no barrier then they should not be split.
On 22/01/19 08:33, David Wales wrote:
I don't know what the OSM convention is for this, but I tend to agree
with Nemanja. It makes more sense to split the two halves of the road,
rather than have them as a single way.
On 22 January 2019 8:23:35 am AEDT, "Nemanja Bračko"
<[email protected]> wrote:
@Warin,
I personally do not see why is it wrong if you split? It is just
two segments merged in one node. Geometry and data are exactly the
same just it is represented as two, instead of one line.
If we go deeper in this issue, it is actually wrong, because you
have marked/mapped 2 physical segments with just one line. Angle
is not natural for any road. However, it doesn't make any
difference in routing so it is acceptable to be mapped as one line
in cases like this.
Thanks,
Nemanja
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, 21:33 Ben Kelley, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Personally I think that's a handy warning.
- Ben
On Tue., 22 Jan. 2019, 07:25 Warin <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
On 22/01/19 02:45, Nemanja Bračko wrote:
I agree on that, but that's the way how this tool works.
So you will have to accept that the tool is wrong and
ignore its output.
Altering the map to comply with a tool that is wrong is
wrong.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
--
Sent from my phone
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
