On 01/04/19 08:41, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 07:49, Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Are you only tagging those sites that are open & already
advertised as tourism sites?
I think that would be the safest way of doing it, because they are
considered sacred sites, so we should be taking care to not show
the location of things that the local peoples may not want shown?
The ones I've seen mapped so far are well signposted and marked out,
widely accepted as public knowledge.
Yep. Only those sites that are commonly known have been mapped.
Others, even some I know of and some with websites, are not on the map
nor commonly visited.
-----------------------
I think my take is;
a rock engraving with no paint => site_type=petroglyph
a rock painting with no engraving => site_type=rock_painting
Where it is both painted and engraved? site_type=rock_art
???
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
