Side note: http://www.opentrees.org may be of interest to you, takes a number of tree datasets in a standard format, renders them.
On Sun, 14 Apr. 2019, 10:16 pm David Sisourath, <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Andrew, I have looked at all of the tags in the raw data and have > created a Python file to process this. > > > > I have considered the ‘Unknown’, ‘Not Applicable’ and also removed the > trees where they are ‘stumps’ or ‘vacant’. > > > > The data is linked here: > > https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-dga-80051ffe-04d5-4602-b15b-60e0d0e3d153/ > > > > I have actually proceeded with a test import on a small area in Seabrook. > A reason why I think a source tag would be useful is the identification of > imported trees in subsequent updates from Council being imported. > > > > I note that this test import is easily reversible by me if plans do not > eventuate. > > > > The test import changeset is here: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69182499#map=16/-37.8860/144.7627 > > > > Also, there is a non-existent boundary through Seabrook Primary School > that renders on Mapnik. I noticed this during the test import and am unsure > of the issue here. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > David > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, April 14, 2019 9:56:38 PM > *To:* David Sisourath > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Importing Hobsons Bay City Council tree data > into OSM > > Great working on sourcing those waivers! > > Do you either have a sample .osm file or could you post an example of what > tags/values will be imported? Can you say anything further about how you > will transform the data? ie. removing "Unknown" values etc. > > Regarding the source tag, I think it must be on the changeset, but can > optionally be on each object as well. It was once pointed out to me that > the source on the object may lead to editors thinking they can't > change/touch the object, and it can also be misleading when changes > subsequently happen. Mind you, I still add source, source:geometry, > source:name etc. tags where I feel it's appropriate manually, I just don't > think it's essential to have them on each object. > > Feel free to post a link to this thread > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-April/012577.html as > a changeset tag or comment to help link the import back to this discussion. > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 15:35, David Sisourath <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I intend to import tree data in the Hobsons Bay LGA into OSM. >> >> >> >> The data has been verified by myself with aerial imagery and DELWP/VicMap >> boundaries. >> >> >> >> I will be importing small squares of data at a time, including the tree >> circumference, species (if known) or genus (if species unknown). Tree >> circumference in the data are grouped by ranges of 150mm. I have taken the >> maximum of these ranges to be the circumference in my code. >> >> >> >> A source tag will be attached to each tree node imported, >> source=data.gov.au:Hobsons Bay City Council, and also on the relevant >> changesets. >> >> >> >> A waiver has been signed by Hobsons Bay and is available on both the >> Australian Data Catalogue page and the Contributors >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Hobsons_Bay_City_Council_data> >> page. >> >> >> >> Any questions or feedback regarding the import would be highly >> appreciated, including whether the approach to the circumference tag, and >> source tag is acceptable. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> David >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
