Hi David, thanks for your explanation. I think it is good practice to use a separate import account, so good on you!
On 15/4/19 11:17 pm, David Sisourath wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > Thanks for the feedback. The trees seen in the adjacent Wyndham City > Council have actually been manually mapped by another contributor. > > > > I will change the changeset comments to be ‘Hobsons Bay Tree Import > - > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Hobsons_Bay_City_Council’. > > > > I have also decided to create a dedicated OSM account for the import. > This will be called HobsonsBayCityCouncil_Import with the user > description linking to the import page. > > > > Let me know if anything on the import page is unclear or if anything > needs changing. I will be undertaking another test import, this time > in an area with existing trees. > > > > Thanks, > > David > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Sebastian Spiess <mapp...@consebt.de> > *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2019 10:31:36 PM > *To:* David Sisourath; Andrew Harvey > *Cc:* talk-au@openstreetmap.org > *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Importing Hobsons Bay City Council tree data > into OSM > > > Hi David, > > I'd like to say that the test import looks very impressive on the map. > Thank you for your effort on this. > > Are there guidelines how to mark the import in the changeset? Not > having read up on it but I would think the changeset should reference > the wiki page for the import? > > For those who are interested in the import, see the wiki here: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Hobsons_Bay_City_Council > > Cheers, Seb > > > On 14/4/19 10:45 pm, David Sisourath wrote: >> >> Thanks Andrew, I have looked at all of the tags in the raw data and >> have created a Python file to process this. >> >> >> >> I have considered the ‘Unknown’, ‘Not Applicable’ and also removed >> the trees where they are ‘stumps’ or ‘vacant’. >> >> >> >> The data is linked here: >> >> https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-dga-80051ffe-04d5-4602-b15b-60e0d0e3d153/ >> >> >> >> I have actually proceeded with a test import on a small area in >> Seabrook. A reason why I think a source tag would be useful is the >> identification of imported trees in subsequent updates from Council >> being imported. >> >> >> >> I note that this test import is easily reversible by me if plans do >> not eventuate. >> >> >> >> The test import changeset is here: >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69182499#map=16/-37.8860/144.7627 >> >> >> >> Also, there is a non-existent boundary through Seabrook Primary >> School that renders on Mapnik. I noticed this during the test import >> and am unsure of the issue here. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> David >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Sunday, April 14, 2019 9:56:38 PM >> *To:* David Sisourath >> *Cc:* talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Importing Hobsons Bay City Council tree data >> into OSM >> >> Great working on sourcing those waivers! >> >> Do you either have a sample .osm file or could you post an example of >> what tags/values will be imported? Can you say anything further about >> how you will transform the data? ie. removing "Unknown" values etc. >> >> Regarding the source tag, I think it must be on the changeset, but >> can optionally be on each object as well. It was once pointed out to >> me that the source on the object may lead to editors thinking they >> can't change/touch the object, and it can also be misleading when >> changes subsequently happen. Mind you, I still add source, >> source:geometry, source:name etc. tags where I feel it's appropriate >> manually, I just don't think it's essential to have them on each object. >> >> Feel free to post a link to this >> thread >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-April/012577.html as >> a changeset tag or comment to help link the import back to this >> discussion. >> >> On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 15:35, David Sisourath >> <david.sisour...@hotmail.com <mailto:david.sisour...@hotmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I intend to import tree data in the Hobsons Bay LGA into OSM. >> >> >> >> The data has been verified by myself with aerial imagery and >> DELWP/VicMap boundaries. >> >> >> >> I will be importing small squares of data at a time, including >> the tree circumference, species (if known) or genus (if species >> unknown). Tree circumference in the data are grouped by ranges of >> 150mm. I have taken the maximum of these ranges to be the >> circumference in my code. >> >> >> >> A source tag will be attached to each tree node imported, >> source=data.gov.au:Hobsons Bay City Council, and also on the >> relevant changesets. >> >> >> >> A waiver has been signed by Hobsons Bay and is available on both >> the Australian Data Catalogue page and the Contributors >> >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Hobsons_Bay_City_Council_data> >> page. >> >> >> >> Any questions or feedback regarding the import would be highly >> appreciated, including whether the approach to the circumference >> tag, and source tag is acceptable. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> David >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
